Exploring T5 Model Pretraining and MLFlow Integration A Journey in ML Deployment
Introduction
Recently, I embarked on an exciting journey to pretrain the T5 model with python pytorch lighting and explore its deployment through WebAssembly (WASM) for experimental project. This experience, combined with discovering MLFlow for experiment tracking, provided valuable insights into modern ML deployment strategies.
T5 Model and WASM Implementation
The attempt to pretrain the T5 model and deploy it via WASM presented an innovative approach to model deployment. While exciting, the process highlighted key challenges:
- Data preparation complexities for training and testing
- Need for robust preprocessing pipelines
- WASM optimization requirements for model performance
MLFlow Integration Experience
MLFlow emerged as a powerful tool for experiment management:
Here is simple tracking wiht MLFlow in pytorch lightning:
from pytorch_lightning.loggers import MLFlowLogger
mlflow_logger = MLFlowLogger(
experiment_name="t5_model",
log_model="all",
tracking_uri="http://localhost:5000")
std_logger.info("Configuring trainer...")
trainer = pl.Trainer(
logger=mlflow_logger,
callbacks=callbacks,
max_epochs=config.max_epochs,
accelerator='gpu' if config.use_gpu else 'cpu',
devices=config.n_gpu if config.use_gpu else None,
precision=config.precision,
strategy='auto',
log_every_n_steps=1,
accumulate_grad_batches=config.gradient_accumulation_steps,
gradient_clip_val=config.max_grad_norm,
deterministic=True,
enable_progress_bar=True,
enable_model_summary=True,
profiler="simple"
)
Key benefits discovered:
- Experiment tracking and versioning
- Model registry capabilities
- Simple deployment workflows
- Self-hosting flexibility
Deployment Considerations
The project revealed various hosting options, each with unique advantages:
WASM Deployment
- Client-side execution
- Reduced server costs
- Browser compatibility challenges
MLFlow Self-Hosting
- Complete control over infrastructure
- Custom configuration options
- Cost-effective for small teams
Future Work
Moving forward, focus areas include:
- Improving training data quality
- Optimizing WASM performance
- Exploring hybrid deployment approaches
- Enhancing MLFlow integration
This experience demonstrates the evolving landscape of ML deployment, highlighting the importance of choosing the right tools and platforms for specific use cases.
Based on use case, we can use different tracking and deployment strategies:
Platform Type | Service | Key Features | Pricing Model | Best For |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud Platforms | AWS SageMaker | - Fully managed ML platform - Built-in monitoring - Auto-scaling - Integrated with AWS | Pay-per-use (compute + storage) | Enterprise ML deployments |
Google Cloud AI | - TensorFlow integration - AutoML features - Global infrastructure - Serverless options | Pay-per-use + resource allocation | TensorFlow workloads | |
Azure ML | - Enterprise security - Automated ML - Azure integration - MLOps support | Subscription + consumption | Microsoft ecosystem users | |
Self-Hosted | Docker | - Platform independent - Custom configurations - Version control - Local testing | Infrastructure costs | Custom model deployment |
Kubernetes | - Container orchestration - Load balancing - High availability - Scalability | Infrastructure + maintenance costs | Large-scale deployments | |
Specialized | Hugging Face | - Transformer models - Easy deployment - Community support - Model hub | Free tier + premium plans | NLP applications |
MLflow | - Experiment tracking - Model registry - Open source - Deployment tools | Free (open source) + hosting costs | ML lifecycle management |